ExtreAdmin1-
24 Dic 2014

I found this thing in my desk again last night, and, as you can tell from the date in the image, below, it’s been following me around since 1998 (!). However, after seventeen years of carrying random clippings like this around in files, folders, drawers, and envelopes—after all, this is only one of many dozens—I decided it was time to get rid of it.

But not before writing a quick post.

The original article actually appeared in Scientific American way back in their 1898 issue, making the fragment, scanned above, just a snippet published 100 years later.

The original was called «A Brazilian Indian Telephone,» and you can read it over at Archive.org. Here’s the bulk of the story:
Mr. Jose Bach, in a narrative of his travels among the Indians of the regions of the Amazon, describes in L’lllustration an instrument by means of which these people communicate with each other at a distance.

These natives live in groups of from one hundred to two hundred persons, and in dwellings called «maloccas,» which are usually situated at a distance of half a mile or a mile apart. In each malocca there is an instrument called a «cambarisa,» which consists essentially of a sort of wooden drum that is buried for half of its height in sand mixed with fragments of wood, bone, and mica, and is closed with a triple diaphragm of leather, wood, and India rubber.

When this drum is struck with a wooden mallet, the sound is transmitted to a long distance, and is distinctly heard in the other drums situated in the neighboring maloccas. It is certain that the transmission of the sound takes place through the earth, since the blows struck are scarcely audible outside of the houses in which the instruments are placed.

After the attention of the neighboring maloccas has been attracted by a call blow, a conversation may be carried on between the cambarisas designated.

According to Mr. Bach, the communication is facilitated by the nature of the ground, the drums doubtless resting upon one and the same stratum of rock, since transmission through ordinary alluvial earth could not be depended upon.
While, in and of itself, this is pretty awesome, there are at least two quick things that really captivate me here:

1) One is the simple idea that the geology of the forest itself can be instrumentalized and turned into a «telephone» network, in the most literal, etymological sense of that word (voices [-phone] at a distance [tele-]). The landscape itself becomes a percussive grid of underground communication, pounding out messages and warnings from home to home, like submarine captains pinging Morse code to one another in the deep.

It’s fascinating and, in fact, deeply strange to imagine that little rumblings or booms in the soil are actually homes corresponding to one another—and that, given the context, they might actually be talking about you.

2) The other thing is how this could be updated or, as it were, urbanized for today. You go down into the basement to get away from your family, bored of your life, trapped in a house you want to leave, wondering if you’ll ever meet true friends, and you start randomly tapping away on the sump pump, when—lo!—someone actually answers back, skittling out a little rhythm for you from another cellar just up the street. A whole suburb of feral children, drumming messages to each other in the dark, hammering on their basement floors.

It’s like those scenes in old prison flicks, where two men tap back and forth all night on their cell walls, only, here, it’s people banging on cellar floors in New York City high rises or hitting sump pumps with mallets in the wilds of suburbia, speaking back and forth through their own «Brazilian Indian Telephone,» a kind of terrestrial sonar.

24 Dic 2014

Many people, especially young students looking at becoming architects and enrolling in an architecture school, often wonder if architecture is an art form.

Can they call themselves artists, without too much pretension?

A large number of architects will probably agree that those who create or design buildings are certainly not artists, at least not in the traditional sense. However, whatever they create are akin to paintings on a very large canvas. Buildings have some limitations; the number one need is to be practical. They need to conform to measurements and standards established by the laws of physics and regulatory entities.

In fact, architecture is sometimes considered a form of science. Spatial awareness, math, and logic are all involved and once you have mastered all these abilities, you are able to be more creative with the designs of your buildings. It is also up to the public to determine whether a building is art – or not so much.

To some people, art is anything that can convey an emotion. There are many buildings that can make a person feel emotional, as soon as people set their eyes on them.

For instance, the Louvre is said to be energetic and beautiful, not because of the lighting and the content, but due to the shape of the building. The reason a building exists, can also add to its perception and luster. As soon as you step into the museum, you don’t want to leave. On the other hand, there are buildings you enter that make you want to spin on your heels and leave immediately.

Many architects treat architecture as art, as they feel that by integrating art pieces into architecture, it tends to make their work richer. Some architects believe that architecture is stand-alone art, and an argument can certainly be made for that stance. Architecture is functional, whereas art is mostly about visual aesthetics and philosophy. Unlike architecture, art is not often thought of as functional and art certainly does not need to be useful on a daily basis, like many people feel about architecture. But that doesn’t mean they are mutually exclusive, either.

If you are interested in studying architecture, speak to as many professional architects as you can. Get an idea of hard it might be or other areas in which you need expertise – municipal law for example. As them the art question and how they view themselves and the world of architects. It’s a fairly small one, but with 1,000s of new buildings being built every year, obviously influential.

One more thing to keep in mind; art is often thought of as fleeting but buildings are meant to last.

24 Dic 2014

Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has beenLorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has beenLorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has beenLorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has beenLorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has beenLorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has beenLorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has beenLorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been

This weekend, Nike will officially launch the Air Max 90 in its original form, and the iconic “Infrared” will certainly reprise its role. There’s no denying that this awesome running silhouette, designed by none other than Tinker Hatfield, is responsible for enhancing the retro phase for Nike, and with popularity that knows no bounds, it can be argued that the Air Max 90 is the most popular Nike running sneaker of all-time.

To celebrate 25 years of Air Max 90, we looked back at the timeline of this sneaker to hand-select the best to have ever released, and during our retrospective, we noticed that every phase of this silhouette has been outstanding; the original colorways were a hit, the collaborations in the 2000s were legendary, and the enhanced versions in recent years were impressive. Read on below.

You may have read about my Gianvito Rossi obsession not too long ago. It may have been obvious to you that I have a soft spot for Rossi’s sophisticated designs, but it took me a while to come to that conclusion. I didn’t want to have to pick favorites, because I really do love an assortment of shoes, but I think it’s clear who the winner is in my mind.

When you write about and analyze shoes as much as I do, you begin to hone in very quickly on what you like and what you don’t like. I like both towering high heels and flats, but I don’t like kitten heels. I love prints and neons, but I’ll pass on metallics–you get the idea. Whenever I’ve written about his shoes in the past, I couldn’t get enough of them, and somehow, someway, Gianvito Rossi made the cut. While I still love a fierce pair of Louboutins, Manolos or Jimmy Choos, there’s something about Rossi’s aesthetic that just clicks with me.

As if my obsession weren’t big enough, I also found three more pairs to add to my list!

I know it can be a very hard decision, but let’s hear it: who’s your favorite footwear designer?

24 Dic 2014

Before anything else, I was saddened yesterday to learn of the passing of Jobst Brandt:

Back in the late 20th century, while still deeply in thrall to Fred-dom, I used to read the «rec.bicycles.tech» group, where Brandt used to tell everybody what was what. Like any Fred I was highly susceptible to the newest and latest gew-gaws, to the extent that I emptied my savings account to purchase the very first iteration of the Ksyrium. (It was an illness, I realize that now.) Even so, Brandt’s authoritative and at times irascible posts resonated with me, and I began to realize and embrace the fact that I had retrogrouch tendencies.

The Kysriums didn’t last long. One day I was Just Riding Along in Manhattan when a hormone-addled teen ran out into the street and kicked my rear wheel for no apparent reason. I didn’t break stride, but the wheel went wildly out of true, and it was never the same after that–nor was my faith in bicycle marketing.

What can I use to keep my oily skin matte and give my skin a bit of coverage?
It’s one thing to seek out a product that addresses shine, it’s another to enlist a product that can keep skin matte and give you some coverage for a fresh face. Keep shine at bay with a pore-smoothing tinted mattifier, like La Roche-Posay Effaclar BB Blur ($30, at drugstores). The formula helps diminish unwanted shine and the appearance of pores with the help of your new favourite ingredient, airlicium, which absorbs three times its weight in oil instantly. The formula also contains perlite, which is an anti-humidity ingredient that keeps skin matte.

What’s a quick way to give my eyes definition?
You have an array of options, from pencils to shadows to cream and gel pots; determining ease of application of all these options isn’t exactly straightforward or simple. Allow us to direct you to a particularly foolproof product: Rodial Eye Sculpt ($34, at Murale). The formula occupies a space somewhere between gel and cream shadow, and the taupe-brown-plum shade can be swooshed across lids with a fluffy eyeshadow brush for a speedy, effortless defined eye. Add more to the lash line and outer corner to elevate the look for evening, resulting in the chicest smokey eye (lazy girls and makeup novices everywhere, rejoice!). Bonus: You can define your brows with this unique cream by running it through brow hairs on an angled brush.

Is there a way to make my mascara less clumpy when I add more to my lashes before heading out for the night?
Topping up your mascara is one of a handful of ways to add to your makeup when transitioning from day to night, but finding yourself with thick, spider-y lashes is never the goal. Try running Urban Decay Mascara Resurrection ($19, sephora.ca) through your lashes with your existing mascara in tact. The lightweight, oil-free serum formula is designed to soften your previously applied mascara coats to prep them for fresh coats, drastically reducing your chances of clumpiness. The lightweight formula contains copper powder and vitamin B5 to condition lashes and bind moisture to them for improved strength.

Few things in this world strike terror into the hearts of men (and women) quite like performing in front of a live audience. Thankfully, our computers and websites have no such qualms, and now they have the capacity to deliver live data like never before.

Live data — or real-time data — certainly isn’t new to the Web; but it’s increasingly pervasive, and with good reason. Today’s Internet users expect immediate gratification. They don’t just want a site to respond to their input; they expect sites to provide information without a click.

Social media is a big driver for these expectations. Users are accustomed to constantly updated content through their social feeds, so they presume this kind of performance from all sites. Today, failure to deliver up-to-date information can create a dissatisfying user experience.

The good news is that technology is making it easier for you to deliver real-time data to your site’s users.

HOW DID WE GET HERE?

The biggest challenge for real-time data was the need for a constantly open client-server connection as opposed to request and response.

For years, the most popular commercial applications for live data were in the financial industry. Finance companies invested heavily in these technologies and closely guarded them as trade secrets. Eventually, independent developers caught up, creating Java applets to make real-time data more accessible for other applications, and later created native web-browser hacks to deliver consistent HTTP connections.

Today, improved servers, browsers, software and other tech advances make it easier to develop for and deliver real-time data. Libraries and services, like Firebase, Signalr, Parse, Meteor, and Socket.io enable us to build and deploy real-time mobile and web apps in minutes. Nearly every developer now has access to the tools necessary to incorporate live data into their projects.

19 Dic 2014

Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

This week Microsoft introduced its new browser, Edge, the project that had formerly been known as Project Spartan.

Much has been made of its Hub feature, and the ability to add personal annotations to websites. However, these features are aimed at regular users, web designers will use the browser in quite a different way; whilst it’s unlikely that the majority of web designers will switch to Edge as their primary browser, the majority of us will be using it on a daily basis to test code.

Whilst we don’t know exactly how Edge will perform until we get hands-on with it, there are some things we do know, and others that we can infer.

A CHANGE OF APPROACH

When I first saw the Edge announcement, what struck me most was the change in emphasis embodied by its logo. Brands are designed to a brief handed down from board level, and so the change of identity likely mimics similar briefs being handed down to development teams.